ACL Graft Options
Broadly speaking the various options for ACL reconstruction are:
- Autograft: tissue from the patient’s own body
- Hamstring tendon
- Patella tendon
- Quadriceps tendon
- Allograft: donor tissue from a cadaver’s body
- Achilles tendon
- Tibialis anterior tendon
- Synthetic: industrial made
Hamstring and patella tendon grafts are the most commonly and widespread used grafts. They have the best and most reliable results short and long term.
Hamstring tendon
- Can be taken from the same injured leg (ipsilateral) or the other knee (contralateral) if the hamstrings have already been taken (e.g. revision operation) or there is a medial sided injury in addition to the ACL injury
- Hamstrings are a group of muscles at the back of the thigh
- Two of these are taken to make the ACL graft:
- Gracillis
- Semitendinosus
- They are then doubled over to obtain adequate thickness for the new ACL graft
- If necessary can be tripled over if doubling was of insufficient thickness for the ACL graft
- No risk of anterior knee pain (pain at the front of the knee) or patella fracture as caused by a patella tendon graft
- Smaller incision (wound) to harvest them
- Less pain in the early and later phases
- Easily available
- Hamstring graft is at least twice as strong as native ACL and when tripled even stronger
Disadvantages
- Common to have patch of numbness around the wound
- Graft healing of soft tissue to bone takes slightly longer than the bone to bone healing that occurs in a patella tendon graft
Verdict:
The preferred graft of choice.
Patella tendon graft
- The middle third of the patella tendon is taken (the tissue that connects the patella to the tibia)
- Along with the tendon, bone blocks on either side are taken i.e. from the patella and the tibia
- That’s why the graft is called medically bone-patella tendon-bone graft
Advantages
- A reliably good graft that used to be the gold standard for ACL reconstruction in the past
- Due to the bone blocks on either side it has more rapid bond to the femur and tibia than a hamstring graft (soft tissue to bone healing is slower)
- This means that patients feel their knee more stable in the first 6-8 weeks compared to hamstrings but later they balance out and feel equally stable
- It is 1.5 times stronger than the native ACL graft
Disadvantages
- More painful (short and long term) than hamstrings as bone blocks are taken from patella and tibia
- Increased risk of ongoing anterior knee pain
- Difficulty with kneeling long term
- As a result it is not recommended in patients with pre-existing anterior knee pain or those who kneel a lot
- Increased risk of graft rupture if patient had pre-existing patella tendinopathy
- Longer wound
- Risk of patella fracture:
- Rare but a bad complication to happen
- Will require further surgery to fix the patella
Verdict:
Reserved for revision ACL reconstruction or upon patient’s request.
Allografts
- Allograft tendons can be:
- Soft tissue:
- Hamstrings
- Tibialis posterior
- Tibialis anterior
- Bone-tendon:
- Bone-patella-tendon-bone
- Achilles tendon
- Quadriceps tendon
Advantages
- No donor site complications from taking an autograft
- No damage to hamstrings or patella tendon
- Less postoperative pain
- Fewer and/or smaller wounds leading to better cosmesis
- Reduced operative time
- Useful in revision ACL and multiligament reconstructions when may have reduced options for autograft use
Disadvantages
- Sterilisation and processing methods can impact quality of the allograft:
- Radiation in particular that was used to sterilise the grafts, has been shown to significantly reduce strength of the graft and increase rate of subsequent rupture
- Allografts should be fresh frozen and non-irradiated and from donors who are less than 40 years old
- Worse outcomes than autografts overall but especially in high demand athletes
- Caution when used in younger athletes (<20 year) as have about 5x higher graft rupture rates
- Slower onset and rate of incorporation of allograft versus autograft
- Concern for disease transmission:
- HIV, hepatitis
- Risk reported to be 1 in 1.6 million
- However, no reported case yet for HIV transmission following allograft ACL reconstruction
- Expensive
- Not as readily available
Verdict:
Can be considered for recreational athlete upon request. Useful in revision and multiligament reconstructions.
Synthetic grafts
- Numerous synthetic grafts have been tried since the 1970s
- The original grafts had an unacceptably high failure rate
- When they did fail they caused excessive synovitis reaction and articular cartilage damage
- They have since been abandoned but newer synthetic grafts have come out since the 1990s
- The newer grafts still have greatly inferior outcomes to autografts and are not as widely used
Advantages
- Quick and easy to use
- Very strong
Disadvantages
- Expensive
- Worse results compared to autografts
- When they fail are more difficult to revise:
- When they rupture they cause excessive inflammatory reaction within the knee and abrasion to the cartilage
Verdict:
Not used for ACL reconstruction.